P1 – Analysing different news headlines
It is often inferred
that news companies such as The Telegraph could be influencing theirs audiences
with political bias. If the news company supported a certain political
leader/group then they are able to portray their opinions and views on them
throughout all of their newspapers and media platforms in order to sway the
opinions of their audience. For example, The Daily Mirror have an article
headline saying ‘Jeremy Corbyn would legalise cannabis for medicinal use’
whereas an article about the same subject is headlined in The Telegraph as
‘Legalise cannabis for medical use, say MPs’. The difference between the two is
shown as The Mirror include who’s idea it was to legalise cannabis whereas the
telegraph generalise it by saying ‘MPs’ suggesting that they aren’t trying to
put any MPs name in a positive and bias way. On the Telegraph, they refer to
Jeremy Corbyn as his job title rather than his name by calling him ‘Shadow
Cabinet Minister’ which suggests that they don’t want him to get full
recognition from those who may not know that it is his job title. However, in
The Mirror it states clearly that it is Jeremy Corbyn’s idea to legalise
cannabis for medical use which puts the focus onto him and not other MPs who
may also think the same, giving him a positive reputation.
Inside
the articles, they both differ as the Telegraph starts the first paragraph off
saying ‘One of Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet ministers has approved a report
calling for cannabis to be legalised for medical use’. This isnt giving credit
to Jeremy Corbyn where as in the Mirror it states clearly that it was infact
Jeremy Corbyn’s idea, not one of his ministers that the Telegraph is
suggesting. The Mirror’s article includes a lot of information about Jeremy
Corbyn’s role in the subject, including quotes of what he said. These quotes
and information are short and easy to read and are used really show him to be
doing a positive thing for the country. This effectively helps increase his
nationwide popularity and it is made sure that he gets full recognition for
this idea which is potentially what the Mirror wants. However, The Telegraph
includes lots of more detailed information and very little about Jeremy Corbyn
himself. He is always refered to as ‘the group’ (his shadow canibet ministers)
which takes away his regontion for supporting legalising marijuana for medical
use. No pictures of Jeremy Corbyn are included whereas in the Mirror there is 1
image and a video showing him talking. It is as though the Telegraph don’t want
Jeremy to get this recognition and they would rather not be bias towards him.
To
conclude the idea that the Mirror favours Jeremy Corbyn, there is a big ‘read
more’ section at the bottom of the article which has the headline ‘Jeremy
Corbyn wins again’ which has plenty of links and images relating to Jeremy’s
successes and positive news stories.


